Multi-trial supply management
TrialSupply manages multiple clinical trials in a single system: each protocol gets its own demand forecast and supply plan, and the portfolio rolls up into centralized reporting — instead of one increasingly fragile workbook per study.
The portfolio problem
Excel-based planning scales linearly in the worst way: every new trial is another workbook, another set of formulas to maintain, another version emailed around before each planning meeting. By the time a sponsor is running a handful of concurrent studies, the planning team spends more time maintaining spreadsheets than analyzing plans — and no one can answer portfolio questions without hand-assembling numbers from separate files.
One system, every protocol
In TrialSupply, each trial is a protocol in the same system, with its own enrollment forecast, treatment arms, demand plan, and planning books — all following the same structure. Planners move between trials without re-learning a workbook's idiosyncrasies, and a colleague can cover a study without archaeology into someone else's formulas.
Portfolio-level insights
Because every trial's plan lives in one place with one structure, cross-trial questions become answerable: where demand is concentrated, which studies share products or depots, and where cross-trial resource allocation decisions need to be made. Centralized reporting replaces the quarterly exercise of stitching workbooks together.
A consistent monthly cadence
Multi-trial management is ultimately about running the same monthly CD&OP process across every study — same inputs reviewed, same forecast-vs-actual comparison, same planning book structure. TrialSupply makes the consistent process the default rather than an aspiration.